I own and moderate on Yahoo lists and only use it for new comers until I
know they mean well. I would put back on moderation anyone who breached
the guidelines of the list.
Moderation inevitable slows down the movement of messages and therefore
many answers are continually repeated by others or lost to the original
questioner.
On 15/03/11 14:45, Kevin Pemberton wrote:
> If on a list that users are more intent on answers rather than agenda
> removing from moderation works. The fact that many here have agenda,
> that shows up from time to time in signatures and such makes continued
> moderation necessary I hope. I believe the moderators are to lean on
> moderation, if I were a moderator here some would be heavily censored.
> My first guideline has to do with any comments about the agenda, be it
> signature or in post. Thats the way it is on lists I Moderate.
>
> Kevin Pemberton
>
>
> On 03/13/2011 03:11 PM, Ian wrote:
>> Pity they do not do that here then.
>>
>> On 13/03/11 04:10, Steve Moody wrote:
>>> A simply answer is to remove members from moderation after they have
>> shown that they can behave. I am on a Dreamweaver list like that.
>> After a few posts, moderation of my messages ceased.
>>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No comments:
Post a Comment